Richard Bucker

where is my private browser based IDE?

Posted at — Jun 22, 2016

I have a few requirements for a browser based IDE:git, mercurial, and/or fossil supportbrowser based robust IDErunning in a docker container in my datacenter or in my DEV serverand optionally CI/CD integrationThere are many browser based IDEs to choose from and some of them are awesome. Cloud9 and nitrous come to mind. I don’t mind paying for it although the price needs to be reasonable and I would like to be able to collaborate too. There is something to be said about running an IDE in a remote system but there are many drawbacks. Any promise of security comes to mind.If you’re in this business and you’re listening… you need to make a container version available that I can run in my private servers with the same cost structure as the public cloud offering. You cannot protect me or my source. My environment may or may not container production information or data that is private and I’m certain your TOS is meant to protect you and not me.So in the order that these IDEs are listed in my browser:Komodo IDE - looks hella cool but it is not browser based.Codiad - this is the first candidate, however, if I recall the IDE is kinda weak and the “build” features are weak. There are docker registry entries but it will take some research to see if there is a trusted version.Codio - has promise, however, the cost is $700/yr and that’s more than I want to pay. It also seems to be more curriculum based.Codepad - does not seem to be an IDEScreenhero - looks like a nice add-on to slack but that has nothing to do with my IDE.Codebox - seems to be deadCodeshare - collab not IDEKobra - more collabNitrous - public web only.Koding - it’s not very clear what they are offering and whether the tools would run as expected. It appears that it’s public only but even so the homepage leave me with an aftertaste.Codenvy - is an odd sort. The pricing model is expensive and in the end they use the eclipse IDE. While it’s java and makes me crazy there is no reason not to go directly to eclipse. (based on eclipse che) Here is a link to the registry entry.ShiftEdit - is the cheapest of the paid-for IDEs but it does not seem to be a complete IDE and while the code is hosted on their site you are providing credentials to your own site for which they may or may not be a man in the middle. It’s a common model/problem.Codeanywhere - is the second cheapest IDE. I’ve used it before and I liked it for what it was. I though there was an on-premise option but that does not seem to be the case.Cloud9 - is probably my favorite. It is the best thought and implemented browser based IDE… but there is no on-premise option and it’s not cheap.Orion - looks pretty limited for what it isEclipse Che - taking or building this app from the source is just not an option. I suppose there is a binary from the eclipse team but even that makes me uneasy. I suppose a container from the eclipse team would be nice. For the trouble it will be to install and setup I’d rather pay for it.dirigible - just APIsIn conclusion non of my choices are brilliant. I’ll try the codenvy container version and see what happens but I’m not holding my breath. Good luck to me.UPDATE - that sucked. ┬áThe eclipse che project did not install properly from docker hub. Once the sock permissions were obliterated there was a version mismatch between the client and server.